Pages
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Florian Schmidt on Kafka becomes more accessible
- Kevin Russell on The original knights of Camelot return
- marcusrowland3da81833ce on Grand days out
- marcusrowland3da81833ce on Grand days out
- marcusrowland3da81833ce on Grand days out
Archives
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- August 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- July 2023
- November 2022
- September 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- March 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- October 2018
- June 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- September 2017
- January 2017
- October 2016
- September 2016
- July 2016
- May 2016
- January 2016
- January 2015
- June 2014
- January 2014
- October 2013
- August 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- July 2012
- May 2012
- January 2012
- October 2011
- September 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
Access for all
Copyrights and wrongs
General library-related news and comment
Interesting folks
Metadata and friends
Shiny tech
Tales from the repository
Writing and publishing
Category Archives: metadata
Concepts in catalogs: Where the data comes from
I’ve now made a few posts about concept-oriented catalogs, describing the basic idea, showing some examples, and talking about the kinds of context they should provide for users. As I mentioned in my first post, concepts in such catalogs are … Continue reading →
Content and context in concept-oriented catalogs
2010 has been designated the year of cataloging research by the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services. So it’s a good time for me to continue my series on concept-oriented catalogs. Before I talk about specific ways to implement … Continue reading →
Posted in architecture, discovery, metadata
|
Comments Off on Content and context in concept-oriented catalogs
Some concepts and their catalogs
This is the second of a series of think-aloud posts on what I’m calling “concept-oriented catalogs”; catalogs that, as Lorcan Dempsey aptly describes them, go “beyond the bibliographic record”. This post will present examples of concept-oriented catalogs, describe the concepts … Continue reading →
Posted in architecture, discovery, libraries, metadata
|
Comments Off on Some concepts and their catalogs
Understanding concept-oriented catalogs
I’ve recently been thinking a fair bit about the future of library catalogs, particularly after reading Diane Hillmann’s review of the recent Library of Congress-commissioned Study of the North American MARC Records Marketplace. Hillmann laments that the study tries to … Continue reading →
Free Decimal Correspondence: Now with more detail and CC0 goodness
I’ve just released a new version of the Free Decimal Correspondence (FDC). FDC is a set of associations between numbers and subject terms that can be used as the basis for linear shelving or subject browsing of a simple library … Continue reading →
Posted in libraries, metadata, open access, repositories, sharing
|
Comments Off on Free Decimal Correspondence: Now with more detail and CC0 goodness
Will OCLC move to a service-oriented business model for bibliographic data?
As you may recall, there’s been a fair bit of criticism (including some of my own) against OCLC’s proposed records use policy, which asserts OCLC’s rights over libraries’ cataloging in ways that would make it very difficult for libraries and … Continue reading →
Do we need a “reader’s rights registry”?
This spring’s Digital Library Federation forum, the last under DLF as an independent organization, included a session for “lightning talks”, where speakers take 5 minutes or less to present an idea or make a demonstration. Here are the remarks I … Continue reading →
The Google Books settlement: A symposium, and a call for library action
Last Friday I went to a fascinating symposium at the Columbia Law School: “The Google Books Settlement: What Will it Mean for the Long Term?” The symposium included presentations by US copyright register Marybeth Peters, and antitrust expert Randal Picker … Continue reading →
Chances to stop and think about the future of library catalogs
OCLC yesterday announced that it is putting its new catalog record usage policy on hold while its Members Council convenes a group to review the proposed policy and suggest changes. I’m very happy to hear this, as the policy was … Continue reading →
Posted in libraries, metadata, open access, sharing
|
Comments Off on Chances to stop and think about the future of library catalogs
Drawing a line in the sand, Part 3: How to respond?
In my previous two posts, I discussed how open library metadata is becoming increasingly important for the future of library content, and how OCLC’s new catalog policy works against it. By asserting proprietary rights over the records in WorldCat, OCLC … Continue reading →
RSS feed