Everybody's Libraries
Libraries for everyone, by everyone, shared with everyone, about everything
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
  • About the Free Decimal Correspondence
  • Free Decimal Correspondence
  • ILS services for discovery applications
  • John Mark Ockerbloom
  • The Metadata Challenge
← Welcome to everybody’s online libraries
Everybody’s Library Questions: Finding films in the public domain →

Build a better registry: My intended comments to the Library of Congress on the next Register of Copyrights

Posted on March 19, 2020 by John Mark Ockerbloom

The Library of Congress is seeking public input on abilities and priorities desired for the next Register of Copyrights, who heads the Copyright Office, a department within the Library of Congress.  The deadline for comments as I write this is March 20, though I’m currently having trouble getting the form to accept my input, and operations at the Library, like many other places, are in flux due to the COVID-19 pandemic.  Below I reproduce the main portion of the comments I’m hoping to get in before the deadline, in the hope that they will be useful for both them and others interested in copyright.  I’ve added a few hyperlinks for context.


At root, the Register of Copyrights needs to do the job the position title implies: Build and maintain an effective copyright registry.

A well designed, up-to-date digital registry should make it easy for rightsholders to register, and for the public to use registration information. Using today’s copyright registry involves outdated, cumbersome, and costly technologies and practices. Much copyright data is not online, and the usability of what is online is limited.

The Library of Congress is now redesigning its catalogs for linked data and modern interfaces. Its Copyright Office thus also has an opportunity to build a modern copyright registry linked to Library databases and to the world, with compatible linked data technologies, robust APIs, and free open bulk downloads. The Copyright Office’s registry and the Library of Congress’s bibliographic and authority knowledge bases could share data, using global identifiers to name and describe entities they both cover, including publications, works, creators, rightsholders, publishers, serials and other aggregations, registrations, relationships, and transactions.

The Copyright Office need not convert wholesale to BIBFRAME, or to other Library-specific systems. It simply needs to create and support identifiers for semantic entities described in the registry (“things, not strings“), associate data with them, and exchange data in standard formats with the Library of Congress catalog and other knowledge bases. As a comprehensive US registry for creative works of all types, the Copyright Office is uniquely positioned to manage such data.

The Deep Backfile project at the University of Pennsylvania (which I maintain) provides one example of uses that can be made of linked copyright data. At

<https://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/webbin/cinfo/colliers>

is a page showing selected copyrights associated with Collier’s Magazine (1888-1957). It links to online copies of public domain issues, contents and descriptive information from external sources like FictionMags, Wikidata, and Wikipedia, and rights contact information for some of its authors. The information shown has no rights restrictions, and can be used by humans and machines. JSON files, and the entire Deep Backfile knowledge base, are available from this page and from Github.

It is not the Copyright Office’s job to produce applications like these. But it can provide data that powers them. Much of our Deep Backfile data was copied manually from scanned Catalog of Copyright Entries pages, and from online catalogs lacking easily exported or linked data. The Copyright Office and the Library of Congress could instead produce such data natively (first prospectively, eventually retrospectively). In the process, they could also cross-pollinate each other’s knowledge bases.

To implement this vision, the Register needs to understand library standards and linked open data technologies, gather and manage a skilled implementation team, and be sufficiently persuasive, trusted, and organized to bring stakeholders together inside and outside the Copyright Office and the Library of Congress to support and fund a new system’s development. If explained and implemented well, a registry of the sort described here could greatly benefit copyright holders and copyright users alike.

The Register of Copyrights should also know copyright law thoroughly, implement sensible regulations required by copyright law and policy, and be a trusted and inclusive expert that rightsholders, users, and policymakers can consult. I expect other commenters to go into more detail about these skills, which are also useful in building a trustworthy registry of the sort I describe. But the Copyright Office is long overdue to be led by a Register who can revitalize its defining purpose: Register copyrights, in up-to-date, scalable, and flexible ways that encourage wide use of the creations they cover, and thus promote the progress of science and useful arts.


Update, March 20: As of the late afternoon on the day of the deadline, the form appears to be still rejecting my submission, without a clear error message.  It did, however, accept a very short submission without any attachment, and with a URL pointing here.  So below I include the rest of my intended comment, listing 3 top priorities. (The essay above was for the longer comment asked for about knowledge, skills, and abilities.) These priorities largely restate in summary form what I wrote above.  

If anyone else reading this was unable to post their full comment by the deadline due to technical difficulties, you can try emailing something to me (or leaving a comment to this post) and posting a simple comment to that effect on the LC site, and I’ll do my best to get your full comment posted on this blog.

  • Priority #1: Make copyright registration data easy to use: Data should be easy to search, consult, and analyze, individually and in bulk, by people and machines, linked with the Library of Congress’s rich bibliographic data, facilitating verification of copyright ownership, licensing from rightsholders, and cataloging and analysis by libraries, publishers, vendors, and researchers.
  • Priority #2: Make effective copyright registration easy to do: Ensure copyright registration is simple, inexpensive, supports a variety of electronic and physical deposits, and where possible supports persistent, addressible identifiers and accompanying data for semantic entities described in registrations, and their relationships.

  • Priority #3: Be a trusted, inclusive resource for understanding copyright and its uses: Creators, publishers, consumers, and policymakers all are concerned with copyright, and with possible reforms. The Register should help all understand their rights, and provide expert and impartial advice and mediation for diverse copyright stakeholders and policymaking priorities.

  • Other factors: The Register of Copyrights should also be capable of creating, implementing, and keeping up to date appropriate regulations and practices required or implied by Congressional statutes. 

(For the “additional comments” attachment, I had a static PDF attachment showing the Collier’s web page linked from my main essay, as it was on March 19.)

 

Share this:

  • Email
  • Print
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Reddit

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

About John Mark Ockerbloom

I'm a digital library strategist at the University of Pennsylvania, in Philadelphia.
View all posts by John Mark Ockerbloom →
This entry was posted in copyright, data, metadata, open access, serials. Bookmark the permalink.
← Welcome to everybody’s online libraries
Everybody’s Library Questions: Finding films in the public domain →
  • RSS feed
  • Pages

    • About
    • Free Decimal Correspondence
    • ILS services for discovery applications
    • John Mark Ockerbloom
    • The Metadata Challenge
  • Recent Posts

    • Public Domain Day countdown on public social media networks
    • Building a new banned books exhibit for a new era
    • Public Domain Day 2022: Trespassers Will
    • Coming soon to the public domain in 2022
    • Public Domain Day 2021: Honoring a lost generation
  • Recent Comments

    • Rebecca on Public Domain Day countdown on public social media networks
    • sinergio katharismou on Public Domain Day countdown on public social media networks
    • Sandra McIntyre on Public Domain Day 2022: Trespassers Will
    • Chris Rusbridge on Public Domain Day 2022: Trespassers Will
    • Younes Ben Amara on Coming soon to the public domain in 2022
  • Archives

    • November 2022
    • September 2022
    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • March 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • October 2018
    • June 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • September 2017
    • January 2017
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • July 2016
    • May 2016
    • January 2016
    • January 2015
    • June 2014
    • January 2014
    • October 2013
    • August 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • July 2012
    • May 2012
    • January 2012
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
  • Access for all

    • Open Access News
  • Copyrights and wrongs

    • Copyfight
    • Copyright & Fair Use
    • Freedom to Tinker
    • Lawrence Lessig
  • General library-related news and comment

    • LISNews
    • TeleRead
  • Interesting folks

    • Jessamyn West
    • John Scalzi
    • Jonathan Rochkind
    • K. G. Schneider
    • Karen Coyle
    • Lawrence Lessig
    • Leslie Johnston
    • Library Loon
    • Lorcan Dempsey
    • Paul Courant
    • Peter Brantley
    • Walt Crawford
  • Metadata and friends

    • Planet Cataloging
  • Shiny tech

    • Boing Boing
    • O’Reilly Radar
    • Planet Code4lib
  • Tales from the repository

    • RepositoryMan
  • Writing and publishing

    • if:book
    • Making Light
    • Publishing Frontier
Everybody's Libraries
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • Everybody's Libraries
    • Join 148 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Everybody's Libraries
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
%d bloggers like this: