Everybody's Libraries
Libraries for everyone, by everyone, shared with everyone, about everything
Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
  • About the Free Decimal Correspondence
  • Free Decimal Correspondence
  • ILS services for discovery applications
  • John Mark Ockerbloom
  • The Metadata Challenge
← Will OCLC move to a service-oriented business model for bibliographic data?
Getting bugs out of our systems →

Free Decimal Correspondence: Now with more detail and CC0 goodness

Posted on May 16, 2009 by John Mark Ockerbloom

I’ve just released a new version of the Free Decimal Correspondence (FDC).  FDC is a set of associations between numbers and subject terms that can be used as the basis for linear shelving or subject browsing of a simple library collection or repository. Like the earlier releases, it’s intended to be reasonably compatible with existing library standards; in particular, with OCLC’s Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) and the Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH).  (Keep in mind, though, that both of those standards go into considerably more detail than FDC does; and neither OCLC nor the Library of Congress sponsors or endorses the FDC in any way.)   This version of the FDC, like the previous releases, is dedicated to the public domain.  More information about the FDC can be found here.

What’s new?

There are two noteworthy features of this release.  First of all, I’ve now defined corresponding subjects for every whole number (from 000 to 999) that’s also defined (and non-optional) in the DDC.  In addition, I’ve gone past the decimal point in some cases to include additional subjects that may be useful in some collections and repositories.  This means that the FDC should now cover at least as many subjects as OCLC’s Dewey Decimal Classification summaries, the most detailed official free-to-read summary of the present-day DDC I know about.

In addition, I’ve now using Creative Commons‘ new CC0 dedication to dedicate the FDC to the public domain.  I’m hoping this will provide more authoritative legalese for clarifying the public domain status of FDC, and also raise awareness of CC0.

OCLC claims copyright and trademark on the DDC, and while the summary of DDC can be freely read on the Web, its use appears to be governed by this license, which states, among other things, that users may “not copy, reproduce, alter, modify, create derivative works, or publicly display any content (except for your own non-commercial use)”.  It further clarifies that “‘non-commercial use’ … is not to be construed as permitting use of the DDC that (although internal) supports or otherwise facilitates your commercial activities.”  (Note also that the linked license applies only to the DDC summary, not to the complete DDC.  If you want a license for the full DDC, you’ll need to contact OCLC.)

With FDC, as with all CC0 and other public domain works, none of the restrictions above apply.  Do with it what you like.

What’s next?

This new release is version 0.05.  As the number suggests, this is still essentially a working draft.  My first draft was released a few months ago on Public Domain Day.  I intend my work on FDC to be a lightweight, spare time project, and therefore hope to advance to a “1.0” release soon, and leave further development, if desired, to others.

Between now and then, I’m not planning to make FDC much bigger than it is now.  But there are still various other subjects not defined at the unit level that are common in repositories and small library collections, and that might be useful to add.  (I originally started this after someone said they wanted to have a Dewey-like classification system for their repository, without worrying about licensing issues.)  I’m happy to take suggestions of additional subjects to include in the next release.  (But use your own subjects of interest, and not terms taken from an OCLC publication.)  I’d also be very interested in hearing about (and fixing) mistakes, inconsistencies, redundancies, and correspondences that could be made more compatible with current library practice than what I have now.

You can send me email about any of the above. I’ll also be at Open Repositories 2009 next week, and would be happy to talk about FDC there with anyone interested.

What else?

There are numerous classification schemes you can use for collections.  My page about FDC includes some discussion of the better-known alternatives you might want to consider.  And if you’d like to work on a new scheme without worrying about compatibility with other systems, you might be interested in the Open Shelves Classification, an ongoing project sponsored by Tim Spalding of LibraryThing.

If FDC sounds like something you’d like to use, adapt, or experiment with, go right ahead.  There’s no need to wait for any further releases, or to ask me about what you want to do, unless you’d like to.  Have at it, and have fun!

Share this:

  • Email
  • Print
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Reddit

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

About John Mark Ockerbloom

I'm a digital library strategist at the University of Pennsylvania, in Philadelphia.
View all posts by John Mark Ockerbloom →
This entry was posted in libraries, metadata, open access, repositories, sharing. Bookmark the permalink.
← Will OCLC move to a service-oriented business model for bibliographic data?
Getting bugs out of our systems →
  • RSS feed
  • Pages

    • About
    • Free Decimal Correspondence
    • ILS services for discovery applications
    • John Mark Ockerbloom
    • The Metadata Challenge
  • Recent Posts

    • Public Domain Day 2022: Trespassers Will
    • Coming soon to the public domain in 2022
    • Public Domain Day 2021: Honoring a lost generation
    • Counting down to 1925 in the public domain
    • From our subjects to yours (and vice versa)
  • Recent Comments

    • Sandra McIntyre on Public Domain Day 2022: Trespassers Will
    • Chris Rusbridge on Public Domain Day 2022: Trespassers Will
    • Younes Ben Amara on Coming soon to the public domain in 2022
    • Jason on Public Domain Day 2021: Honoring a lost generation
    • John Mark Ockerbloom on Public Domain Day 2021: Honoring a lost generation
  • Archives

    • January 2022
    • December 2021
    • January 2021
    • December 2020
    • March 2020
    • January 2020
    • December 2019
    • November 2019
    • October 2019
    • September 2019
    • July 2019
    • June 2019
    • January 2019
    • December 2018
    • October 2018
    • June 2018
    • January 2018
    • December 2017
    • September 2017
    • January 2017
    • October 2016
    • September 2016
    • July 2016
    • May 2016
    • January 2016
    • January 2015
    • June 2014
    • January 2014
    • October 2013
    • August 2013
    • April 2013
    • March 2013
    • February 2013
    • January 2013
    • December 2012
    • July 2012
    • May 2012
    • January 2012
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • January 2011
    • December 2010
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • February 2010
    • January 2010
    • December 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • July 2009
    • June 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
    • August 2008
    • July 2008
    • June 2008
    • May 2008
    • April 2008
    • March 2008
    • February 2008
    • January 2008
    • December 2007
    • November 2007
  • Access for all

    • Open Access News
  • Copyrights and wrongs

    • Copyfight
    • Copyright & Fair Use
    • Freedom to Tinker
    • Lawrence Lessig
  • General library-related news and comment

    • LISNews
    • TeleRead
  • Interesting folks

    • Jessamyn West
    • John Scalzi
    • Jonathan Rochkind
    • K. G. Schneider
    • Karen Coyle
    • Lawrence Lessig
    • Leslie Johnston
    • Library Loon
    • Lorcan Dempsey
    • Paul Courant
    • Peter Brantley
    • Walt Crawford
  • Metadata and friends

    • Planet Cataloging
  • Shiny tech

    • Boing Boing
    • O’Reilly Radar
    • Planet Code4lib
  • Tales from the repository

    • RepositoryMan
  • Writing and publishing

    • if:book
    • Making Light
    • Publishing Frontier
Everybody's Libraries
Blog at WordPress.com.
  • Follow Following
    • Everybody's Libraries
    • Join 146 other followers
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Everybody's Libraries
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: